Rethinking Gender Inclusion in Course Curricula: Opening Pandora’s Box in STEM Education
Tsakalerou M. Perveen A. Ayapbergenov A. Dikhanbayeva D. Lukhmanov Y.
2025Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
IEEE Transactions on Education
2025#68Issue 3293 - 302 pp.
Contribution: This research examines undergraduate students’ perceptions in engineering disciplines toward gender inclusivity in course curricula, focusing on three essential pillars of curricular design: course content, teaching methodology, and course assessment. Background: The shortage of women representation in STEM fields, particularly in engineering, poses a developmental challenge for economies, especially in developing countries transitioning to the knowledge economy. While multiple factors likely influence women’s participation in engineering, this study focuses specifically on how men-centric engineering curricula affect differently male and female students’ satisfaction and perceptions of their educational experience. Research Questions: 1) How do perceptions of gender inclusivity in engineering curricula differ between women and men students across the three pillars of course content, teaching methodology, and assessment processes? 2) How do students’ perceptions of gender inclusivity in engineering curricula change as they progress through their studies, and do these changes differ between genders? Methodology: The study focuses on Kazakhstan, a country with industrial development and gender diversity issues in engineering despite overall gender parity in its scientific workforce. It utilizes a quantitative approach, incorporating a curriculum-focused survey and inferential statistical tests. Findings: The findings reveal gender differences in perceptions of the three curriculum pillars. As students progress through their studies, women’s satisfaction with the curricula significantly deteriorates over time, while men’s satisfaction remains relatively stable. While these findings suggest curricular factors may influence women’s experiences in engineering education, further research is needed to understand the interplay between curricular aspects and other influences, such as societal factors and institutional environments.
Course content , engineering curricula , gender curricula , gender gap , gender-inclusive , teaching
Text of the article Перейти на текст статьи
Nazarbayev University, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Nazarbayev University
10 лет помогаем публиковать статьи Международный издатель
Книга Публикация научной статьи Волощук 2026 Book Publication of a scientific article 2026