John Locke on historical injustice: the redemptive power of contract
Smith B.
2024Routledge
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
2024#27Issue 4488 - 510 pp.
This paper seeks to argue that Locke proposes a coherent theory of restorative justice regarding historical crimes. In two cases that he sets out in the Second Treatise, that of the Greek Christians living in the Ottoman Empire and Englishmen living in the wake of William I’s conquest, the preliminary standard of historical redress is whether the descendants of the conquerors and conquered possess equal political rights. Conquered peoples cannot simply be subsumed or annexed into an existing political order. They must have some say in articulating or agreeing to the laws that govern them. In this respect, Locke’s theory of historical redress emphasizes the redemptive power of contract to overcome historical crimes. Furthermore, the disposition a community has to reimagine its body politic, to enfranchise the dispossessed by forming one body of people, speaks to the degree to which historical injustice is likely to occur.
contract , Grecian Christians , Historical injustice , John Locke , Norman conquest
Text of the article Перейти на текст статьи
Department of Political Science and International Relations, Nazarbayev University, Nursultan, Kazakhstan
Department of Political Science and International Relations
10 лет помогаем публиковать статьи Международный издатель
Книга Публикация научной статьи Волощук 2026 Book Publication of a scientific article 2026