Generative vs. Non-Generative Models in Engineering Shape Optimization
Masood Z. Usama M. Khan S. Kostas K. Kaklis P.D.
April 2024Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
2024#12Issue 4
Generative models offer design diversity but tend to be computationally expensive, while non-generative models are computationally cost-effective but produce less diverse and often invalid designs. However, the limitations of non-generative models can be overcome with the introduction of augmented shape signature vectors (SSVs) to represent both geometric and physical information. This recent advancement has inspired a systematic comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of generative and non-generative models in constructing design spaces for novel and efficient design exploration and shape optimization, which is demonstrated in this work. These models are showcased in airfoil/hydrofoil design, and a comparison of the resulting design spaces is conducted in this work. A conventional generative adversarial network (GAN) and a state-of-the-art generative model, the performance-augmented diverse generative adversarial network (PaDGAN), are juxtaposed with a linear non-generative model based on the coupling of the Karhunen–Loève Expansion and a physics-informed shape signature vector (SSV-KLE). The comparison demonstrates that, with an appropriate shape encoding and a physics-augmented design space, non-generative models have the potential to cost-effectively generate high-performing valid designs with enhanced coverage of the design space. In this work, both approaches were applied to two large foil profile datasets comprising real-world and artificial designs generated through either a profile-generating parametric model or a deep-learning approach. These datasets were further enriched with integral properties of their members’ shapes, as well as physics-informed parameters. The obtained results illustrate that the design spaces constructed by the non-generative model outperform the generative model in terms of design validity, generating robust latent spaces with no or significantly fewer invalid designs when compared to generative models. The performance and diversity of the generated designs were compared to provide further insights about the quality of the resulting spaces. These findings can aid the engineering design community in making informed decisions when constructing design spaces for shape optimization, as it has been demonstrated that, under certain conditions, computationally inexpensive approaches can closely match or even outperform state-of-the art generative models.
design optimization , dimensionality reduction , generative adversarial networks
Text of the article Перейти на текст статьи
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Kabanbay Batyr Ave. 53, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0LZ, United Kingdom
BAR Technologies, Portsmouth, PO1 2JJ, United Kingdom
Group of Data Science, Division of Numerical Analysis & Computational Science, Institute of Applied & Computational Mathematics (IACM), Foundation for Research & Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, 700 13, Greece
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
Department of Naval Architecture
BAR Technologies
Group of Data Science
10 лет помогаем публиковать статьи Международный издатель
Книга Публикация научной статьи Волощук 2026 Book Publication of a scientific article 2026