Assessment of perceived objectivity of clinical evaluation methods in surgical education: an approach using a digital platform
Amanova D. Matyushko D. Bakytzhan A. Bolatbekova A. Sharapatov Y. Silischev D.
2026Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Future Science OA
2026#12Issue 1
Aims: This study aimed to examine surgical trainees’ perceptions of perceived objectivity across clinical competency assessment methods and to integrate these findings into the design of a digital assessment platform. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 154 participants (47 senior medical students, 107 residents in postgraduate years 1–3). A validated questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81) assessed perceived objectivity for four formats: multiple-choice testing (MCQ), oral examinations, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX), and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, non-parametric criteria, regression models, and thematic review of open responses. Results: Mini-CEX (Median = 1.35, IQR = 1–2) and OSCE (Median = 1.51, IQR = 1–2) were rated most objective, while multiple-choice testing (MCQ) was least (Median = 2, IQR = 2–3). No significant differences were found between 6th- and 7th-year students (p > 0.05). Third-year residents, however, reported lower perceived objectivity for multiple-choice testing (MCQ) (p = 0.001). Regression showed gender predicted perceptions of multiple-choice testing (MCQ) (B = 0.377, p = 0.005), whereas age and training level were not significant. Conclusions: Practice-oriented assessments, particularly OSCE and Mini-CEX, were viewed as most objective. Findings support digital platforms that integrate varied, practice-based formats to ensure equitable and comprehensive evaluation of clinical competence.
competency-based learning , digital assessment , digital assessment platform platform , Medical education , Mini-CEX , OSCE , surgical competencies
Text of the article Перейти на текст статьи
Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
Universita degli Study di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan
Karaganda Medical University
Universita degli Study di Roma “Tor Vergata”
Astana Medical University
10 лет помогаем публиковать статьи Международный издатель
Книга Публикация научной статьи Волощук 2026 Book Publication of a scientific article 2026